smon

Chương 4

“Were you hurt?”

“No.”

“He grabbed something from you.”

“A binder.”

“I saw.”

“Then why did you ask?”

“Because videos lie.”

Elena sat behind her desk. Her hand had begun to ache.

Her mother, Celia, lived forty minutes away and worked three days a week at the county library despite having retired from the public school system. She disliked television news, lawyers, and anyone who described themselves as brutally honest.

“Are you in trouble?” Celia asked.

“I don’t know.”

“That means yes.”

“It means I don’t know.”

“Were you supposed to have that paper?”

“Yes.”

“Was he?”

“No.”

“Then why would you be in trouble?”

Elena looked at the anonymous threat on her screen. “Because being right and being allowed to prove it are different things.”

Her mother was quiet.

“You sound like your father,” she said.

Elena nearly ended the call.

Her father had been dead for eight years. He had worked as an insurance adjuster, hated litigation, and believed most disputes survived because someone made money from delay. Elena had entered law school partly to prove his cynicism incomplete and partly because, after his death, arguing with him had become impossible anywhere else.

“I have to go,” she said.

“Eat something.”

“I will.”

“You won’t.”

“I had breakfast.”

“Coffee isn’t breakfast.”

“It had milk.”

“Elena.”

“I have to go.”

She hung up, regretted it, and placed the phone facedown.

In the conference room, Miriam had written three phrases on the whiteboard.

PRIVILEGE REVIEW.

BAR COMPLAINT.

TRIAL STAY.

Nia Brooks, the firm’s investigator, sat at the table eating crackers from a vending-machine packet. She was a former fire marshal with a shaved head, tortoiseshell glasses, and no patience for courtroom language that disguised ordinary wrongdoing.

Ruth sat beside her. Daniel Pierce, the firm’s other named partner, had joined by video from a medical-malpractice deposition across the state. His face froze whenever he frowned, which made him appear calmer than he was.

Miriam closed the door.

“Victor’s firm filed notice that it intends to seek Elena’s disqualification and sanctions for receiving stolen privileged material,” she said. “A disciplinary grievance was submitted to the bar twenty-three minutes after the arrest.”

“Prepared in advance,” Nia said.

“Obviously.”

Ruth looked at Elena. “They knew?”

“They knew there was a leak,” Elena said. “They didn’t know what had been filed.”

Miriam tapped the first phrase. “The judge appointed a special master to review the original file. Until that review is done, we cannot use, quote, describe, or investigate from any document that may be privileged.”

Nia raised a cracker. “Define investigate from.”

“Do not pretend that question is simple.”

“I’m not pretending. I have six months of independent leads. Some overlap with whatever Adrian gave us because reality overlaps with itself.”

“We need a clean-source record for every piece of evidence.”

“We already have one.”

“We need a better one.”

Daniel’s image unfroze. “What exactly is in the file?”

Elena answered. “The original quarterly fire-panel inspection report from eighteen months before the Riverpoint fire. It shows repeated battery faults, disabled corridor alarms, and a recommendation to replace the control board. There’s a routing sheet showing the report went from the maintenance contractor to Riverpoint’s property manager, then to corporate risk, then to Hale Benton after the first tenant complaint.”

“And the privileged material?”

“Internal legal notes attached later. Strategy comments. A draft response to the city. An email printout from Victor instructing Adrian to reclassify the inspection as preliminary and remove it from the ordinary maintenance production.”

Daniel rubbed his forehead. “That email is the warrant.”

“Part of it.”

“What else?”

Elena looked at Adrian’s initials in her memory.

“An affidavit.”

Miriam’s voice sharpened. “From Adrian?”

“Yes.”

“You told me the warrant application relied on a cooperating witness.”

“I wasn’t authorized to name him.”

“You told Victor in open court without telling your own managing partner?”

“I told Victor the warrant was beside the original. Adrian named himself when he whispered.”

Nia stopped eating.

Daniel said, “The microphone picked that up.”

Elena had not considered it.

Miriam took out her phone, found the clip, and played it. The audio was poor until Victor’s line. Elena’s reply came through clearly. Then, under the movement in the room, Adrian’s whisper was faint but intelligible when the volume was raised.

The warrant is signed.

Daniel leaned back. “He’s exposed.”

“He was exposed when he signed the affidavit,” Elena said.

“Not to the entire internet.”

Ruth looked from one lawyer to another. “Is he the one who gave you the report?”

Elena hesitated.

Ruth pushed her chair back. “There it is again.”

“He asked for confidentiality.”

“My son is dead.”

“And Adrian could go to prison.”

“Did he cause the fire?”

“No.”

“Did he help hide why it happened?”

Elena looked at the table. “Yes.”

Ruth stood. “Then maybe prison is not a crazy outcome.”

No one answered.

Ruth left the room. Nia began to rise, but Miriam shook her head.

“Give her a minute.”

Elena wanted to follow anyway. She did not. Sometimes the instinct to comfort was only another way of stopping someone from expressing anger.

Miriam erased BAR COMPLAINT and rewrote it larger.

“Elena, I need every message.”

“You’ll have them.”

“Not a curated production.”

“I know what every means.”

“Do you?”

The question was unfair. That did not make it useless.

The first anonymous envelope had arrived five weeks earlier without a return address. Inside was a single photocopied page from the missing inspection report and a note written in block letters: ASK WHY HALE BENTON REVIEWED A MAINTENANCE RECORD BEFORE THE FIRST LAWSUIT.

Elena had shown it to Miriam and Nia. They had disclosed the page to opposing counsel and requested the original. Victor responded that the document was likely fabricated.

Three days later, Elena received a message from a prepaid number.

Do you protect sources?

She had replied: I protect lawful communications. I cannot help anyone steal documents.

May you like

The answer had seemed cautious at the time.

The next message asked: What if the documents were already hidden?

Other posts